Tuesday, November 19, 2024

Trends Of S&P500 Earnings Forecasts

S&P500 earnings trends and estimates are a notably important topic, for a variety of reasons, at this point in time.

FactSet publishes a report titled “Earnings Insight” that contains a variety of information including the trends and expectations of S&P500 earnings.

For reference purposes, here are two charts as seen in the “Earnings Insight” report of November 15, 2024:

from page 28:

(click on charts to enlarge images)

S&P500 EPS

from page 29:

_____

I post various economic forecasts because I believe they should be carefully monitored.  However, as those familiar with this site are aware, I do not agree with many of the consensus estimates and much of the commentary in these forecast surveys.

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 5893.62 as this post is written

Monday, November 18, 2024

S&P500 EPS Forecasts For 2024-2026 As Of November 15, 2024

As many are aware, Refinitiv publishes earnings estimates for the S&P500.  (My other posts concerning S&P earnings estimates can be found under the S&P500 Earnings label)

The following estimates are from Exhibit 24 of the “S&P500 Earnings Scorecard” (pdf) of November 15, 2024, and represent an aggregation of individual S&P500 component “bottom up” analyst forecasts.  For reference, the Year 2014 value is $118.78/share; the Year 2015 value is $117.46/share; the Year 2016 value is $118.10/share; the Year 2017 value is $132.00/share; the Year 2018 value is $161.93/share; the Year 2019 value is $162.93/share; the Year 2020 value is $139.72/share; the year 2021 value is $208.12/share; the year 2022 value is $218.09/share; and the year 2023 value is $221.36/share:

Year 2024 estimate:

$243.49/share

Year 2025 estimate:

$274.23/share

Year 2026 estimate:

$308.44/share

_____

I post various economic forecasts because I believe they should be carefully monitored.  However, as those familiar with this site are aware, I do not agree with many of the consensus estimates and much of the commentary in these forecast surveys.

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 5896.08 as this post is written

Standard & Poor’s S&P500 EPS Estimates 2024 – 2025 – November 13, 2024

As many are aware, Standard & Poor’s publishes earnings estimates for the S&P500.  (My posts concerning their estimates can be found under the S&P500 Earnings label)

For reference purposes, the most current estimates are reflected below, and are as of November 13, 2024:

Year 2024 estimates add to the following:

-From a “bottom up” perspective, operating earnings of $233.96/share

-From a “bottom up” perspective, “as reported” earnings of $211.67/share

Year 2025 estimates add to the following:

-From a “bottom up” perspective, operating earnings of $272.04/share

-From a “bottom up” perspective, “as reported” earnings of $250.62/share

_____

I post various economic forecasts because I believe they should be carefully monitored.  However, as those familiar with this site are aware, I do not agree with many of the consensus estimates and much of the commentary in these forecast surveys.

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 5894.07 as this post is written

Saturday, November 16, 2024

Philadelphia Fed – 4th Quarter 2024 Survey Of Professional Forecasters

The Philadelphia Fed 4th Quarter 2024 Survey of Professional Forecasters was released on November 15, 2024.  This survey is somewhat unique in various regards, such as it incorporates a longer time frame for various measures.

The survey shows, among many measures, the following median expectations:

Real GDP: (annual average level)

full-year 2024:  2.7%

full-year 2025:  2.2%

full-year 2026:  2.1%

full-year 2027:  2.1%

Unemployment Rate: (annual average level)

for 2024: 4.0%

for 2025: 4.3%

for 2026: 4.2%

for 2027: 4.1%

Regarding the risk of a negative quarter in real GDP in any of the next few quarters, mean estimates are 8.9%, 15.0%, 19.7%, 22.4%, and 23.3% for each of the quarters from Q4 2024 through Q4 2025, respectively.

As well, there are also a variety of time frames shown (present quarter through the year 2033) with the median expected inflation (annualized) of each.  Inflation is measured in Headline and Core CPI and Headline and Core PCE.  Over all time frames expectations are shown to be in the 2.0% to 3.1% range.

_____

I post various economic forecasts because I believe they should be carefully monitored.  However, as those familiar with this site are aware, I do not agree with many of the consensus estimates and much of the commentary in these forecast surveys.

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 5870.62 as this post is written

Thursday, November 14, 2024

Chicago Fed National Financial Conditions Index (NFCI)

The St. Louis Fed’s Financial Stress Index (STLFSI4) is one index that is supposed to measure stress in the financial system. Its reading as of the November 14, 2024 update (reflecting data through November 8, 2024) is -.5700:

STLFSI4

source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, St. Louis Fed Financial Stress Index [STLFSI4], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; accessed November 14, 2024: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/STLFSI4

Of course, there are a variety of other measures and indices that are supposed to measure financial stress and other related issues, both from the Federal Reserve as well as from private sources.

Two other indices that I regularly monitor include the Chicago Fed National Financial Conditions Index (NFCI) as well as the Chicago Fed Adjusted National Financial Conditions Index (ANFCI).

Here are summary descriptions of each, as seen in FRED:

The National Financial Conditions Index (NFCI) measures risk, liquidity and leverage in money markets and debt and equity markets as well as in the traditional and “shadow” banking systems. Positive values of the NFCI indicate financial conditions that are tighter than average, while negative values indicate financial conditions that are looser than average.

The adjusted NFCI (ANFCI). This index isolates a component of financial conditions uncorrelated with economic conditions to provide an update on how financial conditions compare with current economic conditions.

For further information, please visit the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago’s web site:

http://www.chicagofed.org/webpages/publications/nfci/index.cfm

Below are the most recently updated charts of the NFCI and ANFCI, respectively.

The NFCI chart below was last updated on November 14, 2024 incorporating data from January 8, 1971 through November 8, 2024 on a weekly basis.  The November 8 value is -.54587:

NFCI

Data Source: FRED, Federal Reserve Economic Data, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; accessed November 14, 2024:  
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/NFCI

The ANFCI chart below was last updated on November 14, 2024 incorporating data from January 8, 1971 through November 8, 2024, on a weekly basis.  The November 8, 2024 value is -.56896:

ANFCI

Data Source: FRED, Federal Reserve Economic Data, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; accessed November 14, 2024:  
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/ANFCI

_________

I post various indicators and indices because I believe they should be carefully monitored.  However, as those familiar with this site are aware, I do not necessarily agree with what they depict or imply.

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 5671.90 as this post is written

Tuesday, November 12, 2024

Recession Probability Models – November 2024

There are a variety of economic models that are supposed to predict the probabilities of recession.

While I don’t agree with the methodologies employed or probabilities of impending economic weakness as depicted by the following two models, I think the results of these models should be monitored.

Please note that each of these models is updated regularly, and the results of these – as well as other recession models – can fluctuate significantly.

The first is the “Yield Curve as a Leading Indicator” from the New York Federal Reserve.  I wrote a post concerning this measure on March 1, 2010, titled “The Yield Curve as a Leading Indicator.”

Currently (last updated November 4, 2024 using data through October 2024) this “Yield Curve” model shows a 42.045% probability of a recession in the United States twelve months ahead.  For comparison purposes, it showed a 57.055% probability through September 2024, and a chart going back to 1960 is seen at the “Probability Of U.S. Recession Predicted by Treasury Spread.” (pdf)

The second model is from Marcelle Chauvet and Jeremy Piger.  This model is described on the St. Louis Federal Reserve site (FRED) as follows:

Smoothed recession probabilities for the United States are obtained from a dynamic-factor markov-switching model applied to four monthly coincident variables: non-farm payroll employment, the index of industrial production, real personal income excluding transfer payments, and real manufacturing and trade sales. This model was originally developed in Chauvet, M., “An Economic Characterization of Business Cycle Dynamics with Factor Structure and Regime Switching,” International Economic Review, 1998, 39, 969-996. (http://faculty.ucr.edu/~chauvet/ier.pdf)

Additional details and explanations can be seen on the “U.S. Recession Probabilities” page.

This model, last updated on November 1, 2024 currently shows a 1.02% probability using data through September 2024.

Here is the FRED chart:

Smoothed U.S. Recession Probabilities

Data Source:  Piger, Jeremy Max and Chauvet, Marcelle, Smoothed U.S. Recession Probabilities [RECPROUSM156N], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, accessed November 12, 2024:  
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/RECPROUSM156N

The two models featured above can be compared against measures seen in recent posts.  For instance, as seen in the October 14, 2024 post titled “The October 2024 Wall Street Journal Economic Forecast Survey“ economists surveyed averaged a 26% probability of a U.S. recession within the next 12 months.

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 5983.99 as this post is written

Friday, November 8, 2024

Jerome Powell’s November 7, 2024 Press Conference – Notable Aspects

On Thursday, November 7, 2024 FOMC Chair Jerome Powell gave his scheduled November 2024 FOMC Press Conference. (link of video and related materials)

Below are Jerome Powell’s comments I found most notable – although I don’t necessarily agree with them – in the order they appear in the transcript.  These comments are excerpted from the “Transcript of Chair Powell’s Press Conference“ (preliminary)(pdf) of November 7, 2024, with the accompanying “FOMC Statement.”

Excerpts from Chair Powell’s opening comments:

Our monetary policy actions are guided by our dual mandate to promote maximum employment and stable prices for the American people.  We see the risks to achieving our employment and inflation goals as being roughly in balance, and we are attentive to the risks to both sides of our mandate. 

At today’s meeting the Committee decided to lower the target range for the federal funds rate by 1/4 percentage point, to 4-1/2 to 4-3/4 percent.  This further recalibration of our policy stance will help maintain the strength of the economy and the labor market and will continue to enable further progress on inflation as we move toward a more neutral stance over time.   

Excerpts of Jerome Powell’s responses as indicated to various questions:

NICK TIMIRAOS.  Chair Powell, Nick Timiraos from the Wall Street Journal. Roughly one year ago when the ten-year Treasury was flirting with five percent and three-year border trades were near eight percent, you noted how higher borrowing costs if they were sustained could weigh on economic activity. Given that you’ve said you believe policy is restrictive and the Fed is now dialing back that restriction, are the growth risks presented by higher US Treasury yields today any different from those you identified one year ago when inflation was still meaningfully above your target? 

CHAIR POWELL.  So I would just say this, yes we’ve watched the run-up in bond rates and it’s nowhere where it was, of course, a year ago. I guess the — you know, the long-run rates are well below that level. So we’re watching that, things have been moving around, and we’ll see where they settle. I think it’s too early to really say where they settle. Ultimately — I’m sure we’ve all read these decompositions of what, you know — and I certainly have, but it’s not really our job to provide our specific decomposition. I will say, though, that it appears that the moves are not principally about higher inflation expectations, they’re really about a sense of more likely to have stronger growth and perhaps less in the way of downside risks. So that’s what they’re about. You know, we do take financial conditions into account. If they’re persistent and if they’re material, then we’ll certainly take them into account in our policy. But I would say we’re not at that stage right now, it’s just something that we’re watching. And again, these things don’t really have mainly to do with Fed policy, but to do with other factors in the economy. 

also:

STEVE LIESMAN.   If I could just follow up on Nick’s question. Are the current rates something you feel like you need to lean against in that they go against the direction of policy by being — adding restriction to the economy, or do you just take them as a given or perhaps a signal that you should do less? 

CHAIR POWELL.  I — look, I just think — the first question is how long will they be sustained? If you remember, the five percent ten-year people were drawing massively important conclusions only to find, you know, three weeks later that the ten-year was 50 basis points lower. So, you know, it’s material changes and financial conditions that last, that are persistent that really matter. And we don’t know that about these. What we’ve seen so far, you know, we’re watching it, we’re reading — you know, we’re doing the decompositions and reading others, but right now it’s not a major factor in how we’re thinking about things. 

also:

MICHAEL MCKEE. Michael McKee from Bloomberg Radio and Television. You talk a lot about what the data are telling you and how you are dependent on the data. But in terms of forward-looking assessments of the economy, what are you hearing from CEOs or other officials around the country? What did you hear today from the regional bank presidents about what companies and consumers think about where the economy is going from here, rather than looking backwards? And does that match up with what your forecasts have been and what you think the appropriate policy path should be? 

CHAIR POWELL. So it’s hard to characterize a, you know, really interesting set of discussions we had and of course you’ll see them in the minutes in three weeks. But I would say this, I think, you know, the comments from our reserve bank colleagues and from the CEOs that they talk to are pretty constructive on the economy right now; pretty constructive, feeling that the labor market is, you know, back to normal to the point where it’s no longer that much of a discussion topic in their world, whereas two years ago it was all they were talking about. So they feel like the labor market is in balance. People feel good about where the economy is. Demand is obviously pretty strong. And you know, you’re seeing, what, 2.8 percent growth in the third quarter estimated, maybe the year is two and a half. This is — you know, this is a strong economy. It’s actually remarkable how well the U.S. economy has been performing with, you know, strong growth, a strong labor market, inflation coming down. We’re, you know, really performing better than any of our global peers. And I think that is reflected in what you hear from — what I hear people hear from CEOs. I don’t get to talk to a lot of CEOs in my job, but I hear what others summarize from those. And of course, I hear the reserve bank presidents do a lot of that, and it’s pretty constructive overall. Now, that’s not to say there are areas of caution and things like that, but ultimately, overall, pretty positive. 

also:

SIMON RABINOVITCH. Thank you, Chair Powell, Simon Rabinovitch with The Economist. I know you don’t want to share your decomposition of bond yields, but if you look at the breakevens, it is clear that longer-term inflation expectations do seem to have risen up at about 2.5 percent, for example, on the five-year. That’s up half a point from when you cut in September. Do you have any concern at all that longer-term inflation expectations are deanchoring, or put another way, are anchoring at a slightly higher level? Thanks. 

CHAIR POWELL. So we would be concerned if we saw — if we thought we saw longer-term inflation expectations anchoring at a higher level. That’s not what we’re seeing. We’re still seeing between surveys and market readings broadly consistent with — you know, I was — I looked at the five-year, five-year earlier today and it’s probably moved. But it’s just not — it’s just — it’s kind of right where it’s been, and also it’s pretty close to — consistent with two percent PCE inflation. So that’s one that’s been a traditional one that we look at a lot. But overall, expectations seem to be — and have really have throughout this in a place that’s consistent with two percent inflation. But you’re right to say we watch that very carefully, and we will not allow inflation expectations to drift upward. But that’s really why we reacted so sharply back in 2022 was to avoid that. 

KELLY O’GRADY. Hi, Chair Powell, Kelly O’Grady, CBS News. We just talked about what you’ve heard from business leaders on the economy. But many average Americans are still not feeling the strength of the economy in their wallets. So what’s your message to them on when they might expect relief?

CHAIR POWELL. So you’re right that we — you know, we say that the economy is performing well, and it is, but we also know that people are still feeling the effects of high prices, for example. And we went through — the world went through a global inflation shock, and inflation went up everywhere. And you know, it stays with you because the price level doesn’t come back down. So what that takes is it takes some years of real wage gains for people to feel better. And that’s what we’re trying to create. And I think we’re well on the road to creating that. Inflation has come way down, the economy is still strong here, wages are moving up but at a sustainable level. So it’s just — I think what needs to happen is happening, and for the most part has happened. But it will be some time before people, you know, regain their confidence and feel that. And you know, we don’t tell people how to feel about the economy, we respect — completely respect what they’re feeling. Those feelings are true, they’re accurate. We don’t question them, we — you know, we respect them. 

also:

JEAN YUNG. Hi, Chair Powell, Jean Yung with MNI Market News. I wanted to go back to a comment that you had made about Americans being quite unhappy about the cumulative price level rises over the past few years, even though now inflation is back on a path to two percent. Would it be appropriate for the Fed to undershoot for a while on its inflation goal under the average inflation targeting regime so people have a chance to catch up? 

CHAIR POWELL. No, that’s not the way our framework works. We’re aiming for inflation at two percent. We’re — we do not have — we did not think it would be appropriate to deliberately undershoot. And you know, part of the problem there is that low inflation can be a problem, too, in a way. But that’s not part of our framework, and it’s not something we’re going to be looking at in our framework review. Thank you very much.

_____

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 5998.04 as this post is written

Building Financial Danger – November 8, 2024 Update

My overall analysis indicates a continuing elevated and growing level of financial danger which contains many worldwide and U.S.-specific “stresses” of a very complex nature. I have written numerous posts on this site concerning both ongoing and recent “negative developments.”  These developments, as well as other exceedingly problematical conditions, have presented a highly perilous economic environment that endangers the overall financial system.

Also of ongoing immense importance is the existence of various immensely large asset bubbles, a subject of which I have extensively written.  While all of these asset bubbles are wildly pernicious and will have profound adverse future implications, hazards presented by the bond market bubble are especially notable.

Predicting the specific timing and extent of a stock market crash is always difficult, and the immense complexity of today’s economic situation makes such a prediction even more challenging. With that being said, my analyses continue to indicate that a near-term exceedingly large (from an ultra long-term perspective) stock market crash – that would also involve (as seen in 2008) various other markets – will occur. [note: the “next crash” and its aftermath has paramount significance and implications, as discussed in the post of January 6, 2012 titled “The Next Crash And Its Significance“ and various subsequent posts in the “Economic Depression” label]

As reference, below is a daily chart since 2008 of the S&P500 (through November 7, 2024 with a last price of 5973.10), depicted on a LOG scale, indicating both the 50dma and 200dma as well as price labels:

(click on chart to enlarge image)(chart courtesy of StockCharts.com; chart creation and annotation by the author)

S&P500

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 5973.10 as this post is written