Showing posts with label food assistance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label food assistance. Show all posts

Thursday, December 17, 2020

Hunger And Food Insecurity Growth In 2020 And Implications

In past posts I have commented about hunger and what is called “food insecurity” issues, which increased significantly during and after the Financial Crisis.

In 2020, the economic decline has led to a substantial increase in hunger and “food insecurity.” Unfortunately, due to various factors it is difficult to get accurate and timely information on the dynamics of hunger in the United States. However, Feeding America indicates that “more than 50 million people may experience food insecurity in 2020.” Not only is this a substantial portion of the U.S. population, but this appears to be a substantial increase compared to the years of 2018 and 2019.

As well, there have been many articles indicating tremendous (increased) demand for food offered at food banks and other food offering events throughout the country.

Accompanying this hardship are other issues such as the ability for a substantial number of people to be able to make mortgage or rent payments. Ongoing moratoriums on evictions appear to have forestalled a significant if not substantial amount of evictions. However, many problematic issues on this “inability to pay” topic remain unresolved.

From an economic and financial perspective many issues have arisen. There appears to be a significant number of those individuals (as well as businesses) that are encountering a “first time of adversity.” In essence, this means that a person (or business) has experienced a pronounced detrimental change in status for the first time. This can take many forms, from those who have become unemployed for the first time, to those who need to receive free food for the first time, to those who are unable to make rent, mortgage, or other bill payments for the first time, etc.

Also – of particular note – is that these hardships are present despite the overall U.S. household net worth being at record levels. While this dynamic is not necessarily surprising in the current economic era, from a longer-term perspective this would appear odd.

From an economic and financial perspective, as well as societally, I believe there is great significance in what appears to be a substantial increase in those who are experiencing this “first time of adversity.”

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 3716.48 as this post is written

Tuesday, August 19, 2014

"Hunger in America 2014" Report - Notable Excerpts

Yesterday (August 18, 2014) Feeding America released the "Hunger in America 2014" report.  As stated:
Hunger in America 2014 is the sixth and most comprehensive study undertaken. The 2014 study reveals that each year, the Feeding America network of food banks provides service to 46.5 million people in need across the United States, including 12 million children and 7 million seniors. Through a network of 58,000 pantries, meal service programs, and other charitable food programs, the Feeding America network reaches people in need in every community across the U.S.
Other excerpts I found notable, from the full "Hunger in America 2014" (pdf) report in the order they appear, include the following:
page 4:
The economy has experienced an unusually slow recovery since the deep recession in 2008 and 2009. The nation’s poverty rate reached 15.1 percent in 2010, the highest rate since 1993. The poverty rate remained at 15 percent in 2012 with 46.5 million people living in poverty. This is the largest number living in poverty since statistics were first published more than 50 years ago.  Sustained high poverty rates arise in part from high unemployment and falling household incomes. The U.S. unemployment rate exceeded 7.0 percent for five years between late 2008 and late 2013 (about 11 million people in any given month), the longest period of high unemployment in 70 years.  While the unemployment rate indicates that a large number of people cannot find jobs, many others are employed part time because they cannot find full-time work. The government’s measure of underemployment that includes all of these groups averaged 14 percent in fiscal year 2013, compared to a prerecession rate of 8.4 percent in 2007.  On average, about 24 million people were underemployed in 2013. Additionally, others may work full time but due to low wages their earnings do not lift them above the poverty line. Perhaps not surprisingly, real household income dropped 8.3 percent between 2007 and 2012.  Poverty, unemployment, and income, along with other demographic characteristics, are key drivers of individual and household food insecurity across the country.
These economic trends have contributed to rapid growth in the numbers of households seeking and receiving food assistance. The number of people participating in SNAP, the largest federal food assistance program, rose to a new high of 47.6 million in 2013, up from 33.5 million in 2009. While some of this growth can be attributed to changes in SNAP rules, recent studies conclude that the weak economy explains most of the increase. Other government programs that provided nutrition assistance in 2013 also saw high levels of enrollment. About 9 million people received WIC benefits in 2013. In the same year, 21.5 million children received free or reduced-price school lunches, and 11.2 million children received school breakfasts.
page 44:
Feeding America food banks and their partner agencies provide food and services to people in all 50 states, Washington, DC, and Puerto Rico. We estimate that the Feeding America network is currently serving 46.5 million unique individuals in 15.5 million households annually across the United States. The number of clients served and other findings from the Client Survey are further discussed in Chapters 4 and 5. Feeding America carries out this work through the coordinated efforts of its food banks, their partner agencies, and the food programs operated by those agencies. This chapter describes the structure of the network, characteristics of partner agencies in the network, the services the partner agencies provide, and the challenges they face in delivering charitable food assistance, as reported on the Agency Survey.
page 88:
Based solely on the unduplicated client counts, it appears that the Feeding America network has seen an increase over the past four years in the number of clients served annually. Estimates from the HIA 2010 study placed the annual unduplicated client count at that time at 37 million individuals. This apparent growth in unduplicated clients served by the network is likely the combination of changes in the scope and interpretation of the HIA study between 2010 and 2014, and actual growth in the network during that time. Some increase in the number of annual unduplicated clients is expected due to inclusion of additional programs not previously represented in the data.
page 131:
  • Across all client households, 84 percent are food insecure. In households with at least one child that number rises to 89 percent.
  • Client households report making spending tradeoffs between paying for food and paying for other necessities, such as medical care, housing, and utilities. Sixty-six percent of households report choosing between paying for food and medicine or medical care each year, and 31 percent do so every month. Fifty-seven percent of households choose between paying for food and housing annually, with 27 percent doing so on a monthly basis.
  • Sixty-three percent of households plan for charitable food assistance as a part of their monthly household budget.
  • More than half (55 percent) of client households receive monthly benefits from the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Almost half of those not receiving SNAP benefits have never applied, most commonly because they did not think they were eligible. Seventy-two percent of households not receiving SNAP benefits may in fact be income eligible for SNAP.
  • Clients and their households often utilize multiple coping strategies to ensure they have enough food. More than 50 percent receive help from family or friends; 79 percent purchase inexpensive, unhealthy food; 40 percent water down food and drinks to make them last longer; and 23 percent grow food in a garden. Fifty-five percent of households report employing three or more coping strategies to get enough food each year.
Additional details and discussion can be found in the full "Hunger in America 2014" report mentioned above.
_____
The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation
SPX at 1976.70 as this post is written

Monday, November 25, 2013

Food Stamps As Of November 25, 2013

This post is an update to previous posts concerning food stamps.  The program is officially called “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,” or SNAP.  As stated on the SNAP website, “As of Oct. 1, 2008, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the new name for the federal Food Stamp Program.”
The data was last updated November 8, 2013, reflecting August 2013 levels.
Here is a table showing various monthly statistics with regard to national participation and costs going back to FY2010.  As seen in this table, the number of people participating as of August 2013 is 47,665,069, up 1.19% from year-ago (August 2012) levels.  As a reference point, the figure as of June 2009 (the official end of the recession as defined by the NBER) was (originally stated as) 34,882,031.  Longer-term annual data is also available.
As I wrote in the April 12, 2010 post, “Of course, what is particularly disconcerting is not only the extent of participation in these programs, but the fact that this is yet another notable statistic that is getting worse well after the purported end of the recession.”
_____
The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation
SPX at 1804.90 as this post is written

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Food Stamps As Of May 7, 2013


This post is an update to previous posts concerning food stamps.  The program is officially called “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,” or SNAP.  As stated on the SNAP website, “As of Oct. 1, 2008, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the new name for the federal Food Stamp Program.”

The data was last updated April 5, 2013, reflecting January 2013 levels.

Here is a table showing various monthly statistics with regard to national participation and costs going back to FY2011.  As seen in this table, the number of people participating as of January 2013 is 47,772,108 up 2.85% from year-ago (January 2012) levels.  As a reference point, the figure as of June 2009 (the official end of the recession as defined by the NBER) was 34,882,031.  Longer-term annual data is also available.

As I wrote in the April 12, 2010 post, “Of course, what is particularly disconcerting is not only the extent of participation in these programs, but the fact that this is yet another notable statistic that is getting worse well after the purported end of the recession.”
_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 1617.50 as this post is written

Thursday, January 17, 2013

Food Stamps As Of January 17, 2013


This post is an update to previous posts concerning food stamps.  The program is officially called “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,” or SNAP.  As stated on the SNAP website, “As of Oct. 1, 2008, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the new name for the federal Food Stamp Program.”

The data was last updated January 4, 2013, reflecting October 2012 levels.

Here is a table showing various monthly statistics with regard to national participation and costs going back to FY2011.  As seen in this table, the number of people participating as of October 2012 is 47,525,329 up 2.78% from year-ago (October 2011) levels.  As a reference point, the figure as of June 2009 (the official end of the recession as defined by the NBER) was 34,882,031.  Longer-term annual data is also available.

As I wrote in the April 12, 2010 post, “Of course, what is particularly disconcerting is not only the extent of participation in these programs, but the fact that this is yet another notable statistic that is getting worse well after the purported end of the recession.”
_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 1476.09 as this post is written

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Food Stamps As Of September 28, 2012


This post is an update to previous posts concerning food stamps.  The program is officially called “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,” or SNAP.  As stated on the SNAP website, “As of Oct. 1, 2008, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the new name for the federal Food Stamp Program.”

The data was last updated September 28, 2012, reflecting July 2012 levels.

Here is a table showing various monthly statistics with regard to national participation and costs going back to FY2009.  As seen in this table, the number of people participating as of July 2012 is 46,681,833 up 2.94% from year-ago (July 2011) levels.  As a reference point, the figure as of June 2009 (the official end of the recession as defined by the NBER) was 34,882,031.  Longer-term annual data is also available.

As I wrote in the April 12, 2010 post, “Of course, what is particularly disconcerting is not only the extent of participation in these programs, but the fact that this is yet another notable statistic that is getting worse well after the purported end of the recession.”
_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 1455.20 as this post is written

Monday, June 18, 2012

Food Stamps As Of May 31, 2012


This post is an update to previous posts concerning food stamps.  The program is officially called “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,” or SNAP.  As stated on the SNAP website, “As of Oct. 1, 2008, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the new name for the federal Food Stamp Program.”

The data was last updated May 31, 2012, reflecting March 2012 levels.

Here is a table showing various monthly statistics with regard to national participation and costs going back to FY2009.  As seen in this table, the number of people participating as of March 2012 is 46,405,204 up 4.07% from year-ago (March 2011) levels.  As a reference point, the figure as of June 2009 (the official end of the recession as defined by the NBER) was 34,882,031.  Longer-term annual data is also available.

As I wrote in the April 12, 2010 post, “Of course, what is particularly disconcerting is not only the extent of participation in these programs, but the fact that this is yet another notable statistic that is getting worse well after the purported end of the recession.”
_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 1347.57 as this post is written

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Food Stamps As Of February 2012


This post is an update to previous posts concerning food stamps.  The program is officially called “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,” or SNAP.  As stated on the SNAP website, “As of Oct. 1, 2008, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the new name for the federal Food Stamp Program.”

The data was last updated February 1, 2012, reflecting November 2011 levels.

Here is a table showing various monthly statistics with regard to national participation and costs going back to FY2009.  As seen in this table, the number of people participating as of November 2011 is 46,286,294, up 6.17% from year-ago (November 2010) levels.  As a reference point, the figure as of June 2009 (the official end of the recession as defined by the NBER) was 34,882,031.  Longer-term annual data is also available.

As I wrote in the April 12, 2010 post, “Of course, what is particularly disconcerting is not only the extent of participation in these programs, but the fact that this is yet another notable statistic that is getting worse well after the purported end of the recession.”
_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 1347.05 as this post is written

Monday, November 21, 2011

"America's New Poor" Segment - Notable Excerpts


Yesterday, CBS aired a segment on its "Sunday Morning" show titled "America's new poor."

While dynamics similar to those discussed in the segment have been noted in previous posts on this blog, this segment is yet another notable reminder of the changing economic condition and the growing need for food assistance.  This segment focuses on an area, Forsyth County, near Atlanta.

Here are some excerpts that I find especially notable:

But for more families here, prosperity is a pretense. The job's lost, the savings are gone, and the big house is either in foreclosure or on its way. And just keeping food on the table is a struggle.
So Forsyth's newly-needy file into local food banks.
Yesterday's GIVERS have become today's TAKERS.
also:
"The new poor could be you, me, your neighbor, your church member, somebody who has been affected by the economy," she said. "Many of our people who have come for assistance used to be our donors. And they'll say, 'I never thought I'd have to do this, never in my wildest dreams.'"
also:
Nearly 15 percent of Americans are now receiving food stamps, a record level, and a jump of about two-thirds since 2007.
One in SIX Americans - 49 million people - say they have trouble putting food on the table.
At Forsyth County's Lambert High, eight percent of kids now get free lunch, double the number three years ago.
_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 1215.65 as this post is written

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Hunger In The Chicago Area


Yesterday CBSChicago.com had a story titled "Study Finds 1 in 5 Chicagoans Are Hungry."

Although the entire article is worthwhile, I find the following excerpts to be most notable (and disconcerting):
The Greater Chicago Food Depository has, for the first time, done a neighborhood-by-neighborhood breakdown of hunger in the Chicago area.
As WBBM’s Mike Krauser reports, some of the numbers are staggering.
The numbers are growing—and about 20 percent of Chicagoans are hungry, a new analysis found.
also:
As CBS 2′s Derrick Blakley reports, the report found nearly 850,000 people in Cook County aren’t sure where their next meal is coming from.
also:
At St. Sylvester’s Pantry in Logan Square, the story’s much the same. Three years ago, they served 225 families. Now, they serve more than 800.
Deacon Fred Ortiz said, “We have people that have been in banking, people that have been in teaching, medical fields. We have seen a very, very big increase in that type of client coming in for service.”
Overall, the Chicago Food Depository says visits to food pantries are soaring, up 58 percent in the last three years.
Depository CEO Kate Maehr said, “That hunger is not restricted to one neighborhood. It’s in every community and every suburban community in our county and across our state in record numbers.”
_____


The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation


SPX at 1126.84 as this post is written

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Food Stamps As Of September 2011


This post is an update to previous posts concerning food stamps.  The program is officially called “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,” or SNAP.  As stated on the SNAP website, “As of Oct. 1, 2008, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the new name for the federal Food Stamp Program.”


The data was last updated September 1, 2011, reflecting June 2011 levels.

Here is a table showing various monthly statistics with regard to National Level participation and costs going back to FY2008.  As seen in this table, the number of people participating as of June 2011 is 45,183,931, up 9.46% from year-ago (June 2010) levels.  As a reference point, the figure as of June 2009 (the official end of the recession as defined by the NBER) was 34,882,031.  Longer-term annual data is also available.

As I wrote in the April 12, 2010 post, “Of course, what is particularly disconcerting is not only the extent of participation in these programs, but the fact that this is yet another notable statistic that is getting worse well after the purported end of the recession.”
_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation


SPX at 1202.09 as this post is written

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Food Stamps As Of April 2011

This post is an update to previous posts concerning food stamps. The program is officially called “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,” or SNAP. As stated on the SNAP website, “As of Oct. 1, 2008, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the new name for the federal Food Stamp Program.”

The data was last updated April 29, 2011, reflecting February 2011 levels.

Here is a table showing various monthly statistics with regard to National Level participation and costs going back to FY2008. As seen in this table, the number of people participating as of February 2011 is 44,199,391, up 11.64% from year-ago (February 2010) levels. As a reference point, the figure as of June 2009 (the official end of the recession as defined by the NBER) was 34,882,031. Longer-term annual data is also available.

As I wrote in the April 12, 2010 post, “Of course, what is particularly disconcerting is not only the extent of participation in these programs, but the fact that this is yet another notable statistic that is getting worse well after the purported end of the recession.”
_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 1347.32 as this post is written

Thursday, January 6, 2011

Food Stamps As Of December 2010

This post is an update to previous posts concerning food stamps.  The program is officially called “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,” or SNAP.  As stated on the SNAP website, “As of Oct. 1, 2008, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the new name for the federal Food Stamp Program.”

The data was last updated December 2, 2010, reflecting September 2010 levels.

Here is a table showing various monthly statistics with regard to National Level participation and costs going back to FY2007.  As seen in this table, the number of people participating as of September 2010 is 42,911,042, up 16.23% from year-ago (September 2009) levels.  As a reference point, the figure as of June 2009 (the official end of the recession as defined by the NBER) was 34,882,031.  Longer-term annual data is also available.

As I wrote in the April 12 post, “Of course, what is particularly disconcerting is not only the extent of participation in these programs, but the fact that this is yet another notable statistic that is getting worse well after the purported end of the recession.”

A Special Note concerning our economic situation is found here
SPX at 1276.56 as this post is written

Friday, August 20, 2010

Food Stamps As Of August 2010

This post is an update to a post of April 12 concerning food stamps.  The program is officially called “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,” or SNAP.  As stated on the SNAP website, "As of Oct. 1, 2008, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the new name for the federal Food Stamp Program."

The data was last updated August 3, 2010, reflecting May 2010 levels.

Here is a table showing various statistics with regard to National Level participation and costs going back to FY2007.  As seen in this table, the number of people participating as of May 2010 is 40,801,392, up 18.6% from year-ago levels.  As a reference point, the figure as of May 2007 was 26,409,288.

As I wrote in the April 12 post, "Of course, what is particularly disconcerting is not only the extent of participation in these programs, but the fact that this is yet another notable statistic that is getting worse well after the purported end of the recession."

SPX at 1066.48 as this post is written

Monday, April 12, 2010

Food Stamps

I came upon some statistics with regard to food stamps. The program is called "Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program," or SNAP.

The figures are impressively large, unfortunately. As well, the growth rates are brisk.

Here is a table showing the Number of People Participating; as of January the figure is 39,430,724 up 22.4% from year-ago levels.

Here is a table showing the Number of Households Participating.

Of course, what is particularly disconcerting is not only the extent of participation in these programs, but the fact that this is yet another notable statistic that is getting worse well after the purported end of the recession.

SPX at 1194.37 as this post is written

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Food Bank Article

On October 30 The Chicago Tribune had an article titled "Trying to keep up with hunger." The article was about food assistance provided by the Northern Illinois Food Bank, of which Dennis Smith is executive director and CEO.

There are some interesting (and disturbing) passages in the article. Here are a few:

"'The number of people visiting the 525 food pantries, soup kitchens and youth locations across the region has gone up 35 percent from a year ago,' Smith said."

"'Hunger is exploding in northern Illinois and the small agencies are being hit harder than ever before,' Smith said."

"'A lot of the people we're seeing today have never been to a food pantry before,' he [Smith] said during the Oct. 22 tour."

_____

The last quote shown above further reinforces a trend that I commented upon in a July 15 post.  I called this trend the "first time of adversity" effect, a very important concept.


SPX at 1104.90 as this post is written

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

"First Time Of Adversity" Effect

There was a recent article in The Wall Street Journal titled "Detroit's Food Banks Strain to Serve Middle Class":

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124718194179420129.html

One aspect that caught my attention was the mention of people who are receiving aid for the first time. In fact, the story points out that some people who used to be donors to the pantry are now requesting assistance.

During this period of economic weakness, this "first time of adversity" effect seems especially commonplace. It can take many forms, from those who are being laid off for the first time, to those who are receiving food assistance for the first time, to those who are unable to make payments for the first time, etc.

This "first time of adversity" effect is also very prevalent in many aspects of business as well. For example, I recently heard of a retail store that has been in the same location for 30 years, and now has decided not to renew its lease.

The prevalence of this "first time of adversity" effect supports my theory, mentioned previously on this blog, that we are in a "new (economic) environment." Many people as well as businesses that have never before encountered difficulties are now (unfortunately) doing so.

In my opinion this "first time of adversity" effect is very important information; and the "new (economic) environment" theory/reality is of tremendous importance.

SPX at 922.25 as this post is written


Copyright 2009 by Ted Kavadas