Friday, August 2, 2024

U-3 And U-6 Unemployment Rate Long-Term Charts As Of August 2, 2024

Shortly after each monthly employment report I have been posting a continual series titled “3 Critical Unemployment Charts.”

Of course, there are many other employment charts that can be displayed as well.

For reference purposes, below are the U-3 and U-6 Unemployment Rate charts from a long-term historical perspective.  Both charts are from the St. Louis Fed site.  The U-3 measure is what is commonly referred to as the official unemployment rate; whereas the U-6 rate is officially (per Bureau of Labor Statistics) defined as:

Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force

Of note, many economic observers use the U-6 rate as a (closer) proxy of the actual unemployment rate rather than that depicted by the U-3 measure.

Here is the U-3 chart, currently showing a 4.3% unemployment rate:

Unemployment Rate

Data Source: FRED, Federal Reserve Economic Data, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis: Civilian Unemployment Rate [UNRATE] ; U.S. Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics; accessed August 2, 2024: 
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/UNRATE

Here is the U-6 chart, currently showing a 7.8% unemployment rate:

U-6 Unemployment Rate

Data Source: FRED, Federal Reserve Economic Data, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis: Total unemployed, plus all marginally attached workers plus total employed part time for economic reasons  [U6RATE] ; U.S. Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics; accessed August 2, 2024:  
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/U6RATE

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 5376.88 as this post is written

3 Critical Unemployment Charts – August 2024

As I have commented previously, as in the October 6, 2009 post (“A Note About Unemployment Statistics”), in my opinion the official methodologies used to measure the various job loss and unemployment statistics do not provide an accurate depiction; they serve to understate the severity of unemployment.

However, even if one chooses to look at the official statistics, the following charts provide an interesting (and disconcerting) long-term perspective of certain aspects of the officially-stated unemployment (and, in the third chart, employment) situation.

The three charts below are from the St. Louis Fed site.  Here is the Median Duration of Unemployment (current value = 9.4 weeks):

(click on charts to enlarge images)(charts updated as of 8-2-24)

Median Weeks Unemployed

Data Source: FRED, Federal Reserve Economic Data, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis: Median Duration of Unemployment [UEMPMED] ; U.S. Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics; accessed August 2, 2024:  
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/UEMPMED

Here is the chart for Unemployed 27 Weeks and Over (current value = 1.535 million):

Number Unemployed for 27 Weeks & Over

Data Source: FRED, Federal Reserve Economic Data, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis: Civilians Unemployed for 27 Weeks and Over [UEMP27OV] ; U.S. Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics; accessed August 2, 2024: 
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/UEMP27OV

Here is the chart for Total Nonfarm Payroll (current value = 158.723 million):

All Employees, Total Nonfarm

Data Source: FRED, Federal Reserve Economic Data, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis: All Employees: Total Nonfarm [PAYEMS] ; U.S. Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics; accessed August 2, 2024:  
https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/PAYEMS

Our unemployment problem is severe.  The underlying dynamics of the current – and especially future – unemployment situation remain exceedingly worrisome.  These dynamics are numerous and complex, and greatly lack recognition and understanding.

My commentary regarding unemployment is generally found in the “Unemployment” label.  This commentary includes the page titled “U.S. Unemployment Trends,” which discusses various problematical issues concerning the present and future employment situation.

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 5446.68 as this post is written

Thursday, August 1, 2024

Jerome Powell’s July 31, 2024 Press Conference – Notable Aspects

On Wednesday, July 31, 2024 FOMC Chair Jerome Powell gave his scheduled July 2024 FOMC Press Conference. (link of video and related materials)

Below are Jerome Powell’s comments I found most notable – although I don’t necessarily agree with them – in the order they appear in the transcript.  These comments are excerpted from the “Transcript of Chair Powell’s Press Conference“ (preliminary)(pdf) of July 31, 2024, with the accompanying “FOMC Statement.”

Excerpts from Chair Powell’s opening comments:

Recent indicators suggest that economic activity has continued to expand at a solid pace.  GDP growth moderated to 2.1 percent in the first half of the year, down from 3.1 percent last year.  Private domestic final purchases, or PDFP, which excludes inventory investment, government spending, and net exports and usually sends a clearer signal on underlying demand, grew at a 2.6 percent pace over that same period, the first half.  Growth of consumer spending has slowed from last year’s robust pace but remains solid.  Investment in equipment and intangibles has picked up from its anemic pace last year.  In the housing sector, investment stalled in the second quarter after a strong rise in the first.  Improving supply conditions have supported resilient demand and the strong performance of the U.S. economy over the past year.   

In the labor market, supply and demand conditions have come into better balance.  Payroll job gains averaged 177 thousand jobs per month in the second quarter, a solid pace but below that seen in the first quarter.  The unemployment rate has moved up but remains low at 4.1 percent.  Strong job creation over the past couple of years has been accompanied by an increase in the supply of workers, reflecting increases in participation among individuals aged 25 to 54 years and a strong pace of immigration.  Nominal wage growth has eased over the past year and the jobs-to-workers gap has narrowed.  Overall, a broad set of indicators suggests that conditions in the labor market have returned to about where they stood on the eve of the pandemic—strong but not overheated. 

Inflation has eased notably over the past two years but remains somewhat above our longer-run goal of 2 percent.  Total PCE prices rose 2.5 percent over the 12 months ending in June; excluding the volatile food and energy categories, core PCE prices rose 2.6 percent.  Longer-term inflation expectations appear to remain well anchored, as reflected in a broad range of surveys of households, and businesses, and forecasters, as well as measures from financial markets.

Excerpts of Jerome Powell’s responses as indicated to various questions:

RACHEL SIEGEL. Hi Chair Powell, Rachel Siegel from the Washington Post. Thanks for taking our questions. On inflation, do the past few months of good reports look like what we saw last year, where you really had a lot of momentum, with a few bumps in between. Would you characterize that kind of momentum as back on track at this point in the year? 

CHAIR POWELL. Actually what we’re seeing now is a little better than what we saw last year. Last year, as we pointed out late in the year, a whole lot of the progress we saw last year was from goods prices, which were going down at an unsustainable rate, disinflating at an unsustainable rate. This is a broader disinflation, this has goods prices coming down but we’re also now seeing progress in the other two big categories; non-housing services and housing services. So the things we’ve only, you’ve got one quarter of that, we had seven months of low inflation, you got one quarter of this. I would say the quality of this is higher and it’s good, but so far it’s only a quarter. So I think we need to see more to know that we’re, to have more confidence that we’re on a good path down to 2 percent. But as I mentioned, our confidence is growing because we’ve been getting good data. And things like the ECI Report, and frankly the softening in the labor market conditions, give you more confidence that the economy’s not overheating, it doesn’t look like an overheating economy, and it looks like an economy that’s normalizing.

also:

MICHAEL MCKEE. Michael McKee from Bloomberg Radio and Television. I’d like to ask you about the balance of risks as the American people see it. At this point is the risk greater to leave interest rates where they are, given the damage that higher interest rates do to the economy in slowing demand and raising prices? Or is it more important for the American people that you keep rates where they are to bring inflation down?

CHAIR POWELL. I think that we’ve been given an assignment by Congress, this is how we serve the American people is by achieving maximum employment and price stability, right? And so in our quasi constitutional document, the Statement on Longer-Run Goals and Monetary Policy Strategy, we look at the two goals and if one of them is farther away than the other, the two variables; inflation and employment, if one is farther away from its goal than the other, you concentrate on the one that’s farther away. And you take kind of the time to reach the goal. So, for the last couple of years the best service we could do to the American people was to focus on inflation. But as inflation has come down, and I think the upside risks to inflation have decreased as the labor market has cooled off, and now and labor market has softened, probably the inflation– inflation’s probably a little farther from its target than is the employment, but I think the downside risks to the employment mandate are real now. So we have to weigh all that and if you think of where that takes us is we have a restrictive policy rate, it’s clearly restrictive, it’s been the rate we’ve had in place for a full year, and the time is coming, as other central banks around the world are facing the same question, the time is coming at which it will begin to be appropriate to dial back that level of restriction so that we may address both mandates. 

MICHAEL MCKEE. Well you have event risk basically, with the jobs report on Friday and another one before you meet again. Are you certain that you won’t fall behind the curve and lead to unnecessary unemployment if you wait until September? 

CHAIR POWELL. Certainty is not a word that we have in our business. So, we get a lot of data between now and September, and it isn’t going to be one data read or even two, it’s going to be the totality of the data, all of the data, and not just– and then how is that affecting the outlook and how is it affecting the balance of risks? That’s going to be the assessment that we do. Of course we’ll all look carefully at the employment report, but so much other data coming in and so much happening between now and the September meeting, and we’ll make a judgment. 

also:

AMARA OMEOKWE.  Thank you, Chair Powell, Amara Omeokwe with Bloomberg. There seems to be quite a difference between what the anecdotal data are telling us, such as the very recent downbeat Beige Book, and the hard data. Do you take those anecdotes seriously? That is that the economy and labor market are cooling much more rapidly than what’s shown in the data. 

CHAIR POWELL.  So, I do take that seriously, and the Beige Book is great. What’s even greater is hearing the Reserve Bank presidents come in and talk about their conversations with businesses, and business leaders and workers, and people in the nonprofit sector in their districts. But I’ll tell you, it’s a pretty, the picture is not one of a slowing or a really bad economy, it’s one of there are spots of weakness and there are regions where growth is stronger than other regions, but overall, it’s again, look at the aggregate data. Aggregate data is, particularly PDFP, Private Domestic Final Purchases, is 2.6 percent and that’s a good indicator of private demand. So we listen to all of that and it does, I think it’s important to listen to anecdotal data and not just look at the aggregate data. Especially it’s very hard, GDP data can be volatile quarter to quarter. So, it’s just hard to measure economic activity, there are a lot of, it’s just difficult to do. So, I look at both, but I wouldn’t say that the anecdotal data is uniformly downbeat, it’s more mixed. 

_____

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 5416.80 as this post is written

VIX Charts Since The Year 2000 – August 1, 2024 Update

For reference purposes, below are two charts of the VIX from year 2000 through the July 31, 2024 close, which had a value of 16.36.

Here is the VIX Weekly chart, depicted on a LOG scale, with the 13- and 34-week moving averages, seen in the cyan and red lines, respectively:

(click on chart to enlarge image)(chart courtesy of StockCharts.com; chart creation and annotation by the author)

VIX Weekly 16.36

Here is the VIX Monthly chart, depicted on a LOG scale, with the 13- and 34-month moving average, seen in the cyan and red lines, respectively:

(click on chart to enlarge image)(chart courtesy of StockCharts.com; chart creation and annotation by the author)

VIX Monthly 16.36

____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 5522.30 as this post is written

S&P500 Charts Since 2009 And 1980 – August 1, 2024 Update

In the March 9, 2012 post (“Charts of Equities’ Performance Since March 9, 2009 And January 1, 1980“) I highlighted two charts for reference purposes.

Below are those two charts, updated through the latest daily closing price.

The first is a daily chart of the S&P500 (shown in green), as well as five prominent (AAPL, IBM, AMZN, SBUX, CAT) individual stocks, since 2005. There is a blue vertical line that is very close to the March 6, 2009 low. As one can see, both the S&P500 performance, as well as many stocks including the five shown, have performed strongly since the March 6, 2009 low:

(click on chart to enlarge image)(chart courtesy of StockCharts.com; chart creation and annotation by the author)

S&P500 and prominent stocks since 2005

This next chart shows, on a monthly LOG basis, the S&P500 since 1980.  I find this chart notable as it provides an interesting long-term perspective on the S&P500′s performance.  The 20, 50, and 200-month moving averages are shown in blue, red, and green lines, respectively:

(click on chart to enlarge image)(chart courtesy of StockCharts.com; chart creation and annotation by the author)

S&P500 since 1980

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 5522.30 as this post is written

Long-Term Charts Of U.S. Equity Indexes As Of August 1, 2024

StockCharts.com maintains long-term historical charts of various major stock market indices, interest rates, currencies, commodities, and economic indicators.

As a long-term reference, below are charts depicting various stock market indices for the dates shown.  All charts are depicted on a monthly basis using a LOG scale.

(click on charts to enlarge images)(charts courtesy of StockCharts.com)

The Dow Jones Industrial Average, from 1900 – July 26, 2024:

DJIA since 1900

The Dow Jones Transportation Average, from 1900 – July 26, 2024:

DJTA since 1900

The S&P500, from 1925 – July 26, 2024:

S&P500 since 1925

The Nasdaq Composite, from 1978 – July 26, 2024:

Nasdaq Composite since 1978

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 5522.30 as this post is written

U.S. Dollar Decline – August 1, 2024 Update

U.S. Dollar weakness is a foremost concern of mine.  As such, I have extensively written about it, including commentary on the “A Substantial U.S. Dollar Decline And Consequences” page.  I am very concerned that the actions being taken to “improve” our economic situation will dramatically weaken the Dollar.  Should the Dollar substantially decline from here, as I expect, the negative consequences will far outweigh any benefits.  The negative impact of a substantial Dollar decline can’t, in my opinion, be overstated.

The following three charts illustrate various technical analysis aspects of the U.S. Dollar, as depicted by the U.S. Dollar Index.

First, a look at the monthly U.S. Dollar from 1983.  This clearly shows a long-term weakness, with the blue line showing technical support until 2007, and the red line representing a (past) trendline:

(charts courtesy of StockCharts.com; annotations by the author)

(click on charts to enlarge images)

USD Monthly 103.86

Next, another chart, this one focused on the daily U.S. Dollar since 2000 on a LOG scale.  The red line represents a (past) trendline.  The gray dotted line is the 200-day M.A. (moving average):

USD 200dma 103.86

Lastly, a chart of the Dollar on a daily LOG scale.  There is possible technical support depicted by the dashed light blue line:

USD Daily 103.86

I will continue providing updates on this U.S. Dollar situation regularly as it deserves very close monitoring…

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 5522.30 as this post is written

Problems Within The U.S. Economic Situation – August 1, 2024

Various surveys, economic growth projections, and market risk indicators indicate sustained economic growth and financial stability for the foreseeable future.

However, there are various indications – many of which have been discussed on this site – that this very widely-held consensus is in many ways incorrect.  There are many exceedingly problematical financial conditions that have existed prior to 2020, and continue to exist.  As well, numerous economic dynamics continue to be exceedingly worrisome and many economic indicators have portrayed facets of weak growth or outright decline currently as well as prior to 2020.

Of paramount importance is the resulting level of risk and the future economic implications.

From an “all things considered” standpoint, I continue to believe the overall level of risk remains at a fantastic level – one that is far greater than that experienced at any time in the history of the United States.

Cumulatively, these highly problematical conditions will lead to future upheaval.  The extent of the resolution of these problematical conditions will determine the ongoing viability of the financial system and economy as well as the resultant quality of living.

As I have previously written in “The U.S. Economic Situation” updates:

My analyses continues to indicate that the growing level of financial danger will lead to the next stock market crash that will also involve (as seen in 2008) various other markets as well.  Key attributes of this next crash is its outsized magnitude (when viewed from an ultra-long term historical perspective) and the resulting economic impact.  This next financial crash is of tremendous concern, as my analyses indicate it will lead to a Super Depression – i.e. an economy characterized by deeply embedded, highly complex, and difficult-to-solve problems.

_____

The Special Note summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation

SPX at 5522.30 as this post is written